Skip to Main Content

About

Hours

Summer Semester
Monday-Thursday: 8am-6:30pm
Friday: 8am-5pm
Saturday: 12 noon-5pm
Sunday: CLOSED

(See also full Library Hours Calendar.)

Get Research Help

All Research Help Options

Contact Us

Circulation & Research:
(513) 244-4216

Email: library@msj.edu

Location:
Archbishop Alter Library
Mount St. Joseph University
5701 Delhi Road
Cincinnati, OH 45233

Website URL:  https://library.msj.edu

Social Media:   Library instagram accountTwitter X LogoLibrary goodreads account

Cellphone Use

The Archbishop Alter Library is committed to providing an environment conducive to research and study.  In order to maintain a quiet learning environment, the Library asks all patrons to turn their cell phone ringer OFF when entering the Library and be considerate of those studying around them by not answering calls in quiet study areas. 

Patrons making or receiving cell phone calls are welcome to use the WPS Starbucks Cafe or the hallway outside the Library's main entrance.

In addition to the Reading Room, quiet study spaces are available on the 2nd and 3rd floors of the library.

Children in the Library

Although the Library is open to the community, our collections and facilities are intended primarily for the faculty, staff and students of the Mount St. Joseph University.  We strive to provide an environment that is pleasant and conducive to study and research.

For their safety, we ask that children under 15 be supervised at all times by a parent or other responsible adult. Campus Police will be notified of unattended children.

Children under 15 who are accompanied by an adult are permitted in the Library providing that their behavior is appropriate for an academic library.

Parents (or other responsible adult) will be held responsible for their children’s behavior. Loud or disruptive children and their responsible adult may be asked to leave.

Children under 15 are not permitted to use the computer workstations in the Library.

Parents will be held responsible for any damage caused to library property by their children.

The Library Staff cannot be responsible for children who are left unattended in the library.

Copyright Compliance & Generative AI

Guidance Pertaining to Copyright Compliance and Generative AI Software

Generative AI (e.g., ChatGPT, CoPilot, Gemini, etc.) tools are impacting the academic and societal landscape. As a relatively new and evolving technology, regulations and legal guardrails are still being formed. At the same time, publishers are investigating instances of copyright violation and are filing lawsuits. The MSJ Library recognizes that you may not be fully aware of the legal ramifications of using copyrighted materials and licensed materials within a generative AI system. Therefore, this guidance serves to inform you of your responsibility to comply with US Copyright Law and with publisher/vendor license agreements that govern the Mount Community’s use of materials that are subject to these agreements:

  • It is not permissible for you to upload any copyrighted or licensed materials (books, journal articles, etc.) to any publicly accessible or public-facing generative AI software unless you have express permission from the owner and/or licensor of these materials. Put differently, if uploading copyrighted/licensed materials to a generative AI system would result in uploading those materials to the corpus used to train that AI software, then you are not permitted to upload those materials to that system.
  • Some licensors do allow users to upload their licensed materials to a local-use only instance (that is, an instance only available to the subscriber or authorized users—see further explanation below) of generative AI software that is in a self-hosted environment, provided the data processed by such software is not shared with unauthorized third parties. Before uploading any materials to a local-use instance, check to see if there is a license agreement for the materials, and check the terms of the agreement to make sure such use of the materials is permitted.

Please note that there are strong potential consequences for violations of publishers’ license agreements. Publishers can and will revoke access to their materials without warning for the entire Mount Community if they suspect a breach of their license agreements. If you elect to use generative AI, you are personally responsible for ensuring that you follow all publishers’ policies about use of their licensed materials with generative AI systems.

For more in-depth discussion of this topic, see further explanation below. Thanks in advance for being a responsible member of the Mount Community and a good steward of intellectual property by complying with US Copyright Law, as well as publishers’ license agreements regarding use of their content with generative AI.

If you have questions about the use of copyrighted or licensed content with ChatGPT or generative AI apps, please feel free to contact the MSJ Library: library@msj.edu.

­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­_________________________________________________________

As stated above, it is not permissible for you to upload any copyrighted or licensed materials (books, journal articles, etc.) without the copyright owner’s and/or licensor’s express permission to any publicly accessible or public-facing AI software. So for example, you must not upload copyrighted or licensed content to the publicly accessible version of ChatGPT. This is due to the fact that the copyrighted/licensed material is being added to the generative AI’s training corpus, and thus you cannot control how the generative AI software uses such material. For example, ChatGPT could include (and in fact has been known to include) large excerpts of copyrighted material in the output that it creates, and to do so without attribution. This is why, for example, the New York Times (and other copyright owners) have filed lawsuits against ChatGPT.

It might be permissible for you to upload copyrighted material to your own local-use (private) instance of AI software for your own research use or the use of other authorized users. I say “might” here because there are caveats in this scenario you will need to consider. Many copyrighted materials are published with licensing agreements that contains terms of use. These terms of use specify both which uses of the licensed material are permitted and which uses are prohibited. A few publishers are now providing some limited allowances for uploading their content to a local-use instance of AI software for data analysis and other research purposes, as long as the publisher’s content is not being added to the corpus used to train that software. However, some publishers prohibit such use of their materials, and still other publishers have not yet specified in their license agreements whether such use is permissible or not. Therefore, if you considering uploading licensed materials to your own private instance of AI software, you will need to determine on a case-by-case basis whether or not you have express permission to do so based on the publisher’s license agreement, because you can only upload content from publishers that expressly grant permission to do so in their licensing agreements. Furthermore, before sharing any output created by your instance of the AI software with others, you will need to make sure the output doesn’t contain any unattributed excerpts from the licensed materials you loaded into the software. Finally, you may only share the output with authorized users as determined by the publishers’ licensing agreements. In this context, “authorized users” would be limited to only other members of the Mount Community (i.e., current students, employees, and authorized Mount-affiliated users). To be clear: the burdens of compliance, both with reference to copyright law and any relevant licensing agreements, is upon you as the end user.

To further clarify what a “local-use only instance means,” this would be an instance of a generative AI software program that is only available to the end user(s) and therefore the output isn’t publicly accessible. In other words, a local-use instance would be a purchased subscription to the software. So for example, ChatGPT has a subscription plan where you can purchase a subscription to ChatGPT for your workplace. In this example, only you and your fellow Mount Community members would have access to this instance of the software and therefore only you have access to its output. OpenAI, the owner of ChatGPT, wouldn’t be able to add the content added to your instance of the software to its training corpus, and therefore no one else in the world would have access to the output other than you and Mount colleagues and/or students (unless, of course, you chose to share it with someone else).

This is in contrast to the ChatGPT website. When you interact with the free version of ChatGPT on the website, anything you upload to ChatGPT on the public/free website goes into ChatGPT’s corpus, and the software trains on that content and can incorporate the content you uploaded into any output (documents, slides, etc.) that the software creates. Your content could theoretically be included in any output that ChatGPT creates for any other end user in the world. And thus this creates a copyright violation. For example, if I were to upload a PDF of a journal article to the free/public version of ChatGPT and tell it to give me a summary of the article, the full text of that journal article is now in ChatGPT’s training corpus, and ChatGPT can include any or all of the journal article in any other output it creates for any other end user in the world. Thus, I’ve shared a copy of that article with the rest of the world in a way that is a direct violation of US Copyright Law. In contrast, if I purchase a subscription to ChatGPT, I could possibly upload an article to my subscription/local-use instance and ask it to provide a summary of the article for me and whoever else is an “authorized user” of the subscription (like my fellow Mount co-workers or students, for example). In this scenario, the content of that journal article is, so to speak, “staying with” my own instance of ChatGPT—it isn’t being added to ChatGPT’s training corpus. Now notice I said I could “possibly” upload the article because I still need, even in this situation, to be aware that the publisher of that journal article may not allow its content to be uploaded to any instance of a generative AI software, either publicly or privately (i.e. subscriber-only) accessible.

In summary one of the key factors in determining whether or not you can upload copyrighted or licensed content to a generative AI software is this question: will the content you’re uploading be added to the corpus that trains whichever generative AI software you’re using? If the answer to that question is yes, then you cannot upload the content in question unless you first secure express written permission from the copyright owner and/or licensor to upload their content. If the answer to that question is no, you might be able to upload the content, but again, the responsibility is upon you as the end user to determine whether or not any licensing statements are in effect that would restrict uploading the material in question to any generative AI software, regardless of whether or not the material will be added to the AI’s training corpus. Again, this is due to the fact that some publishers provide permission for such activity, while others strictly prohibit any use of their materials with any instance of generative AI software, even local-use (private) instances.

Library Laptops

  • Laptops are available for checkout at the circulation desk.
  • Laptops can be checked out by current students, employees, emeriti faculty, alumni, Sisters of Charity, and other members of the Mount Community using their Mount ID card. They must present their ID card to the attendant at the circulation desk in order to check out a laptop.
  • Any student or employee who checks out a laptop is required to comply with the University’s “Responsible Use of Technology” policy.
  • Laptops may be taken outside of the Library to class. As previously stated, any student or employee who checks out a laptop is required to comply with the University’s “Responsible Use of Technology” policy (see previous bullet point for link to policy). If a student checks out a laptop and does not return it, the replacement cost of the laptop will be charged to the student’s account. If an employee or other member of the Mount Community does not return a laptop, they will receive a bill from the library for the replacement cost.
  • If someone requests a laptop and none are available, the circulation desk attendant will assist with placing a hold on the next available laptop. Additional laptops are also available at the ISS Helpdesk.
  • Laptops are checked out for a three-hour period. At the end of the three-hour period, the laptop must be returned to the circulation desk. If the person who checked out the laptop needs to continue using it, they can return it to the circulation desk and check it out again for an additional three hours as long as no one else is waiting to use it. A fee of $1.00 per hour will be charged for laptops returned late.
  • Contact the Director of Library services for any questions or concerns regarding these guidelines.

Student Employment

  • Why work in the library?
    Employment in the library provides students with a source of income but more importantly, a variety of skills that will contribute to their success at the Mount and in their future careers. Student employees develop important customer service skills, learn how to use information and research tools, and collaborate with librarians in a professional working environment.
  • Student Employment Positions
    The library employs work study students in the Access Services department. Students in the Access Services department assist patrons at the Circulation Desk, re-shelve library materials, process OhioLINK requests and deliveries, etc. Student workers also assist with tasks and projects in other library departments as assigned. Student employees generally work between 10 - 15 hours per week.
  • Employment Eligibility
    The library considers currently enrolled work study-eligible student applicants first, but also hires currently enrolled non-work study-eligible students based on scheduling needs. Once hired, Mount students may continue their employment in the library if their work study eligibility changes. Previous library experience is not a requirement for employment. The library looks for students with a strong work ethic, demonstrated customer service skills, and an eagerness to learn new skills.
  • Applications and Interviewing
    Interested student applicants can apply online using the student employment website. New job openings are regularly emailed to students by Human Resources (student.employment@msj.edu). Qualified applicants will be contacted by email to arrange for an interview.