Summer Semester
Monday-Thursday: 8am-6:30pm
Friday: 8am-5pm
Saturday: 12 noon-5pm
Sunday: CLOSED
(See also full Library Hours Calendar.)
Circulation & Research:
(513) 244-4216
Email: library@msj.edu
Location:
Archbishop Alter Library
Mount St. Joseph University
5701 Delhi Road
Cincinnati, OH 45233
Website URL: https://library.msj.edu
The Archbishop Alter Library is committed to providing an environment conducive to research and study. In order to maintain a quiet learning environment, the Library asks all patrons to turn their cell phone ringer OFF when entering the Library and be considerate of those studying around them by not answering calls in quiet study areas.
Patrons making or receiving cell phone calls are welcome to use the WPS Starbucks Cafe or the hallway outside the Library's main entrance.
In addition to the Reading Room, quiet study spaces are available on the 2nd and 3rd floors of the library.
Although the Library is open to the community, our collections and facilities are intended primarily for the faculty, staff and students of the Mount St. Joseph University. We strive to provide an environment that is pleasant and conducive to study and research.
For their safety, we ask that children under 15 be supervised at all times by a parent or other responsible adult. Campus Police will be notified of unattended children.
Children under 15 who are accompanied by an adult are permitted in the Library providing that their behavior is appropriate for an academic library.
Parents (or other responsible adult) will be held responsible for their children’s behavior. Loud or disruptive children and their responsible adult may be asked to leave.
Children under 15 are not permitted to use the computer workstations in the Library.
Parents will be held responsible for any damage caused to library property by their children.
The Library Staff cannot be responsible for children who are left unattended in the library.
Guidance Pertaining to Copyright Compliance and Generative AI Software
Generative AI (e.g., ChatGPT, CoPilot, Gemini, etc.) tools are impacting the academic and societal landscape. As a relatively new and evolving technology, regulations and legal guardrails are still being formed. At the same time, publishers are investigating instances of copyright violation and are filing lawsuits. The MSJ Library recognizes that you may not be fully aware of the legal ramifications of using copyrighted materials and licensed materials within a generative AI system. Therefore, this guidance serves to inform you of your responsibility to comply with US Copyright Law and with publisher/vendor license agreements that govern the Mount Community’s use of materials that are subject to these agreements:
Please note that there are strong potential consequences for violations of publishers’ license agreements. Publishers can and will revoke access to their materials without warning for the entire Mount Community if they suspect a breach of their license agreements. If you elect to use generative AI, you are personally responsible for ensuring that you follow all publishers’ policies about use of their licensed materials with generative AI systems.
For more in-depth discussion of this topic, see further explanation below. Thanks in advance for being a responsible member of the Mount Community and a good steward of intellectual property by complying with US Copyright Law, as well as publishers’ license agreements regarding use of their content with generative AI.
If you have questions about the use of copyrighted or licensed content with ChatGPT or generative AI apps, please feel free to contact the MSJ Library: library@msj.edu.
_________________________________________________________
As stated above, it is not permissible for you to upload any copyrighted or licensed materials (books, journal articles, etc.) without the copyright owner’s and/or licensor’s express permission to any publicly accessible or public-facing AI software. So for example, you must not upload copyrighted or licensed content to the publicly accessible version of ChatGPT. This is due to the fact that the copyrighted/licensed material is being added to the generative AI’s training corpus, and thus you cannot control how the generative AI software uses such material. For example, ChatGPT could include (and in fact has been known to include) large excerpts of copyrighted material in the output that it creates, and to do so without attribution. This is why, for example, the New York Times (and other copyright owners) have filed lawsuits against ChatGPT.
It might be permissible for you to upload copyrighted material to your own local-use (private) instance of AI software for your own research use or the use of other authorized users. I say “might” here because there are caveats in this scenario you will need to consider. Many copyrighted materials are published with licensing agreements that contains terms of use. These terms of use specify both which uses of the licensed material are permitted and which uses are prohibited. A few publishers are now providing some limited allowances for uploading their content to a local-use instance of AI software for data analysis and other research purposes, as long as the publisher’s content is not being added to the corpus used to train that software. However, some publishers prohibit such use of their materials, and still other publishers have not yet specified in their license agreements whether such use is permissible or not. Therefore, if you considering uploading licensed materials to your own private instance of AI software, you will need to determine on a case-by-case basis whether or not you have express permission to do so based on the publisher’s license agreement, because you can only upload content from publishers that expressly grant permission to do so in their licensing agreements. Furthermore, before sharing any output created by your instance of the AI software with others, you will need to make sure the output doesn’t contain any unattributed excerpts from the licensed materials you loaded into the software. Finally, you may only share the output with authorized users as determined by the publishers’ licensing agreements. In this context, “authorized users” would be limited to only other members of the Mount Community (i.e., current students, employees, and authorized Mount-affiliated users). To be clear: the burdens of compliance, both with reference to copyright law and any relevant licensing agreements, is upon you as the end user.
To further clarify what a “local-use only instance means,” this would be an instance of a generative AI software program that is only available to the end user(s) and therefore the output isn’t publicly accessible. In other words, a local-use instance would be a purchased subscription to the software. So for example, ChatGPT has a subscription plan where you can purchase a subscription to ChatGPT for your workplace. In this example, only you and your fellow Mount Community members would have access to this instance of the software and therefore only you have access to its output. OpenAI, the owner of ChatGPT, wouldn’t be able to add the content added to your instance of the software to its training corpus, and therefore no one else in the world would have access to the output other than you and Mount colleagues and/or students (unless, of course, you chose to share it with someone else).
This is in contrast to the ChatGPT website. When you interact with the free version of ChatGPT on the website, anything you upload to ChatGPT on the public/free website goes into ChatGPT’s corpus, and the software trains on that content and can incorporate the content you uploaded into any output (documents, slides, etc.) that the software creates. Your content could theoretically be included in any output that ChatGPT creates for any other end user in the world. And thus this creates a copyright violation. For example, if I were to upload a PDF of a journal article to the free/public version of ChatGPT and tell it to give me a summary of the article, the full text of that journal article is now in ChatGPT’s training corpus, and ChatGPT can include any or all of the journal article in any other output it creates for any other end user in the world. Thus, I’ve shared a copy of that article with the rest of the world in a way that is a direct violation of US Copyright Law. In contrast, if I purchase a subscription to ChatGPT, I could possibly upload an article to my subscription/local-use instance and ask it to provide a summary of the article for me and whoever else is an “authorized user” of the subscription (like my fellow Mount co-workers or students, for example). In this scenario, the content of that journal article is, so to speak, “staying with” my own instance of ChatGPT—it isn’t being added to ChatGPT’s training corpus. Now notice I said I could “possibly” upload the article because I still need, even in this situation, to be aware that the publisher of that journal article may not allow its content to be uploaded to any instance of a generative AI software, either publicly or privately (i.e. subscriber-only) accessible.
In summary one of the key factors in determining whether or not you can upload copyrighted or licensed content to a generative AI software is this question: will the content you’re uploading be added to the corpus that trains whichever generative AI software you’re using? If the answer to that question is yes, then you cannot upload the content in question unless you first secure express written permission from the copyright owner and/or licensor to upload their content. If the answer to that question is no, you might be able to upload the content, but again, the responsibility is upon you as the end user to determine whether or not any licensing statements are in effect that would restrict uploading the material in question to any generative AI software, regardless of whether or not the material will be added to the AI’s training corpus. Again, this is due to the fact that some publishers provide permission for such activity, while others strictly prohibit any use of their materials with any instance of generative AI software, even local-use (private) instances.